Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Dawson v. Archambeau, et al
as 21-1307
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES RALPH DAWSON, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF ARCHAMBEAU, the CEO of Colorado Health Partners, RICK RAEMISCH, Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections, SUSAN TIONA, Chief Medical Officer of the Colorado Department of Corrections and others
Dawson v. Archambeau, et al
as 20-1451
Defendant / Appellee:
RICK RAEMISCH, Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections, T. SICOTTE, C. IRELAND, FCF Health Providers and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES RALPH DAWSON, JR.
Simon v. Borrego et al
as 1:2019cv03724
Defendant:
Stephanie Dalton, Lengerich, Daufenbauch and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Simon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Dawson
as 19-1412
Respondent:
C. IRELAND, FCF Health Providers, SUSAN TIONA, Chief Medical Officer of the Colorado Department of Corrections, D. HIBBS and others
Petitioner:
JAMES RALPH DAWSON, JR.
HANSON v. PHYSICIAN HEALTH PARTNERS LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00393
Defendant:
KIM VIGUE, PHYSICIAN HEALTH PARTNERS LLC, TIM CANHAM and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD HANSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lang v. Reed et al
as 1:2019cv01558
Defendant:
Stephanie Dalton, Daniel Reed, Michelle Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Session v. Carson et al
as 1:2018cv00239
Plaintiff:
Franky L. Session
Defendant:
Vanessa Carson, Lindsey E. Fish, Teddy L. Laurance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawson v. Archambeau et al
as 1:2016cv00489
Plaintiff:
James R. Dawson, Jr.
Defendant:
Jeff Archambeau , C. Irelend, T. Sicotte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huddleston v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2015cv02537
Plaintiff:
Dale Justin Huddleston
Defendant:
State of Colorado, Andrew Martinez, Andrew (I) Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
