Cases 1 - 10 of 64
K.O. et al v. SESSIONS, III et al
as 1:2020cv00309
Defendant:
ALEX AZAR, JOHN DOE CBP AGENTS, JOHN DOE ORR PERSONNEL and others
Plaintiff:
C.J., F.C., L.J. and others
Amicus Curiae:
IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Dunbar v. Nielsen et al
as 2:2020cv00810
Respondent:
Matthew Albence, JOHN TSOUKARIS, KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN and others
Petitioner:
Peter Lee Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CEBALLOS v. BARR et al
as 2:2020cv00422
Respondent:
MATTHEW ALBENCE, JOHN TSOUKARIS, JEFFERSON BEAUREGARD SESSIONS, III and others
Petitioner:
WILLIAM SANTILLIAN CEBALLOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Diaz-Ceja v. Nielsen
as 1:2019cv00824
Respondent:
Kirsten Nielsen, Jefferson Beauregard Sessions, III, Johnny Choate and others
Petitioner:
Joel Diaz-Ceja
Interested Party:
CASE MANAGER FOR Joel Diaz-Ceja
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SEJIENY v. NIELSEN et al
as 2:2019cv05153
Respondent:
MATTHEW ALBENCE, JOHN TSOUKARIS, KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN and others
Petitioner:
WAEL OMAR SEJIENY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dunbar v. Nielsen et al
as 1:2019cv01151
Respondent:
Matthew Albence, John Tsoukaris, Kirstjen M. Nielsen and others
Petitioner:
Peter Lee Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02484
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Hidalgo-Montalvo v. Sessions III et al
as 3:2018cv02486
Petitioner:
Enrique Hidalgo-Montalvo
Respondent:
David Harlow, Steven C Stafford, Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02485
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02487
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
