Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Paul v. USA
as 2:2024cv02039
Petitioner:
Jeffery William Paul
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Paul v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Western District of Arkansas)
as 6:2024cv06034
Petitioner:
Jeffery William Paul
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paul v. USA
as 6:2024cv06041
Petitioner:
Jeffery William Paul
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Paul v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Western District of Arkansas)
as 6:2024cv00463
Petitioner:
Jeffery William Paul
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Riverside Regional Jail Authority et al
as 3:2023cv00666
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Williams
Defendant:
Riverside Regional Jail Authority, Larry Leabough, Dennis Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv22446
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Owens
as 1:2023cv02215
Petitioner:
Jeffery Williams
Respondent:
Craig D. Owens, Sr and Cobb County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05558
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01816
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PIPORE v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
MWAMARATUNGA PIPORE
Defendant:
JACOB BEASLEY, RALPH SHROPSHIRE, DELISHA BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
