Cases 1 - 10 of 50
USA v. Jeffrey Beard, II
as 20-14397
Defendant / Appellant:
JEFFREY BEARD, II, a.k.a. JP
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Renny Claus v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 18-80021
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
RENNY CLAUS
Defendant - Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD, Secretary CDCR, GUILLERMO VIERA ROSA, Director Div. of Adult Parole and FRANCISCO JACQUEZ, Warden, Does 1-2
John Hardney v. USDC-CASF
as 18-70058
:
In re: JOHN FREDERICK HARDNEY
Petitioner:
JOHN FREDERICK HARDNEY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest:
JEFFREY FERGUSON, JEFFREY BEARD and STEVEN TUCKER
Kevin R. Schrubb I v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2017cv08594
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Jeffrey Beard, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin R Schrubb, I
Ross Jay Curtis II v. Jeffrey Beard
as 2:2017cv07481
Respondent:
Jeffrey Beard
Petitioner:
Ross Jay Curtis II
Francisco Hernandez v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 17-55126
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO RENE HERNANDEZ, AKA Rene Lopez
Respondent:
KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General and JEFFREY BEARD
In re: Alton D. Brown, et al
as 16-2749
Petitioner:
In re: ALTON D. BROWN
Respondent:
GARY L. LANCASTER, J. CURTIS JOYNER, THOMAS J. RUETER and others
Nominal Respondent:
JAMES M. MUNLEY
California Sportfishing Protecting Alliance v. Beard
as 2:2015cv01027
Plaintiff:
California Sportfishing Protecting Alliance
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
In re: Alton Brown, et al
as 15-1616
Petitioner:
In re: ALTON D. BROWN
Respondent:
GARY L. LANCASTER, J. CURTIS JOYNER, THOMAS J. RUETER and others
Nominal Respondent:
JAMES M. MUNLEY
S.S. v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2014cv00667
Plaintiff:
S.S.
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Jeffrey Beard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
