Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Binder v. Michael Kors (USA), Inc.
as 25-32
Defendant:
DOES 1-50, INCLUSIVE and MICHAEL KORS (USA), INC., Delaware Corporation
Plaintiff:
ANGELA WALDNER, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, JENNIFER MCCALL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, DEMETRA BINDER, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
McCall v. Express, Inc. et al.
as 2:2023cv03739
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER MCCALL
Defendant:
EXPRESS, INC. and Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Binder et al v. Michael Kors (USA), Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03941
Plaintiff:
Demetra Binder, Angela Waldner and Jennifer McCall
Defendant:
Michael Kors (USA), Inc. and Does 1-50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
McCall v. USA-2255
as 8:2016cv00370
Petitioner:
Jennifer McCall
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McCall v. USA-2255
as 8:2015cv03344
Respondent:
USA-2255
Petitioner:
Jennifer McCall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McCall v. Bank of America Corporation Short Term Disability Plan et al
as 6:2015cv02380
Plaintiff:
Jennifer McCall
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation Short Term Disability Plan and Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
US v. Jennifer McCall
as 14-6646
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JENNIFER MCCALL, a/k/a Jennifer Jones
McCall v. USA - 2255
as 8:2014cv00635
Petitioner:
Jennifer McCall
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Law et al v. Metropolitan Money Store Corp. et al
as 8:2007cv03043
Plaintiff:
Katrina M. Law, Katrina M. Law, Victoria A. Cole-Rolon and others
Defendant:
Metropolitan Money Store Corp., Fordham and Fordham Investment Group, LTD., RTE Title & Escrow, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
