Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Turane v. The Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 9:2021cv00370
Defendant:
D. Venettozzi, Shawn Dandridge, The Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and others
Respondent:
The State of New York and D. Montrey
Plaintiff:
Trumaine Turane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turane v. The Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 1:2020cv08985
Defendant:
Bridgette Fortune, The Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Tina M. Stanford and others
Plaintiff:
Trumaine Turane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hutchins v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 7:2016cv00676
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Hutchins
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hutchins v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv28882
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Hutchins
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
States, et al v. Johnson & Johnson, et al
as 13-6288
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KIM DARNALL, DEBBILYNN DAVILA, JAMIE DAVIS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Johnson & Johnson, et al v. States, et al
as 13-606
Petitioner:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON, INC.
Respondent:
MICHELLE STATES, PATRICIA ORDINO, KIM DARNALL and others
States et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 5:2013cv00841
Plaintiff:
Michelle States , Patricia Ordino , Kim Darnall and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
States et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as OKW/5:13-cv-00841
Plaintiff:
Michelle States , Patricia Ordino , Kim Darnall and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
