Cases 1 - 10 of 14
PAYNE v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv00945
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
JESSE L. PAYNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PAYNE v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 2:2017cv00404
Defendant:
JUSTIN COLE, SUZI DIEHL, ENITH GREEN and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE L. PAYNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAYNE v. PARKE COUNTY SHERIFF JUSTIN COLE
as 2:2017cv00102
Defendant:
CHARLES BOLINGER, CITY OF ROCKVILLE, IND., JUSTIN COLE and others
Respondent:
PARKE COUNTY SHERIFF JUSTIN COLE
Petitioner:
JESSE L. PAYNE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jesse Payne v. Rob Clover, et al
as 13-1508
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSE L. PAYNE
Defendant - Appellee:
ROB CLOVER, Superintendent Isac Ray Treatment Center, CARL PIERCEFIELD, Supervisor Isac Ray Treatment Center and JOE WATTS, Supervisor Isac Ray Treatment Center
Jesse Payne v. Rob Clover, et al
as 13-1436
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSE L. PAYNE
Defendant - Appellee:
ROB CLOVER, Superintendent Isac Ray Treatment Center, CARL PIERCEFIELD, Supervisor Isac Ray Treatment Center and JOE WATTS, Supervisor Isac Ray Treatment Center
Jesse Payne v. Superintendent
as 13-1222
Petitioner - Appellant:
JESSE L. PAYNE
Respondent - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT
Jesse Payne v. Steve Turner, et al
as 13-1053
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSE L. PAYNE
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVE TURNER, BRAD TEMPLETON, PAUL BOLINGES and others
PAYNE v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2013cv00005
Defendant:
STEVE CARTER, STATE OF INDIANA and SUPERINTENDENT
Plaintiff:
JESSE L. PAYNE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Payne v. Superintendent
as 3:2012cv00839
Petitioner:
Jesse L Payne
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jesse Payne v. Richard Brown
as 12-3826
Petitioner - Appellant:
JESSE L. PAYNE
Respondent - Appellee:
RICHARD BROWN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
