Cases 1 - 10 of 70
United States v. Matlock
as 23-5117
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JESSE RAY MATLOCK
Hardee v. USA
as 23-50733
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jesse Ray Hardee, also known as Jesse Hardee
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
RUTTEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13255
Plaintiff:
JESSE RAY RUTTEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CRIST v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv23308
Plaintiff:
JESSE RAY CRIST
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Abrams v. Shaffer et al
as 3:2022cv05990
Plaintiff:
Jesse Ray Abrams
Defendant:
Jeffrey Shaffer, Chad M Enright and Allyson Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abrams v. Enright
as 3:2022cv05826
Plaintiff:
Jesse Ray Abrams
Defendant:
Chad M Enright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19840
Plaintiff:
JESSE RAY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mattingly et al v. Herman et al
as 0:2022cv03436
Plaintiff:
Steven Mattingly and Christopher Rose
Defendant:
Jesse Ray Herman and Edgewater Pools LLC
Not Classified By Court:
UIM Carrier Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and Allstate Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Jesse Jaggers v. Randy Valley
as 22-35510
Petitioner / Appellant:
JESSE RAY JAGGERS
Respondent / Appellee:
NEVILLE LIZ, Warden and RANDY VALLEY, Warden
LUND v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv05399
Plaintiff:
Jesse Ray Lund
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETLY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
