Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Ralph Baker v. Jim Barnes, et al
as 12-1461
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RALPH BAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
JIM BARNES, ASST. ADMINISTRATOR, GREG BARTKOWSKI, Administrator, PAULA DOW, ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
MORALES et al v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2011cv06585
Plaintiff:
WILSON MORALES, WILLIAM MORALES and GREGORY R. RAVENELL
Defendant:
GARY LANIGAN, GREG BARTOWSKI, JIM BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Tormu Prall
as 11-4011
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Respondent:
JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
JEROME B SIMANDLE
Tormu Prall v. Joseph Bocchini, Jr., et al
as 11-3956
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
In re: Tormu Prall, et al
as 11-3640
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Respondent:
JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
In re: Tormu Prall
as 11-2578
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Respondent:
JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
HARRIS v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2011cv01321
Plaintiff:
GOLDA D. HARRIS
Defendant:
GARY LANIGAN, DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, GREG BARTKOWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAKER et al v. BARNES et al
as 3:2011cv00992
Plaintiff:
RALPH BAKER and SHARON BERRY BAKER
Defendant:
JIM BARNES, GREG BARTKOWSKI, PAULA DOW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Barnes et al
as 2:2010cv01116
Plaintiff:
Regina Harris
Defendant:
Jim Barnes, Michael Turner, Michael Weiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00667
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Right to re-employment of inducted persons
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
