Cases 1 - 7 of 7
IN RE: INVOKANA (CANAGLIFLOZIN) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
as 3:2016md02750
Plaintiff:
MARIA PUENTE , CARLOS PUENTE , STELLA S. BENJAMIN and others
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CO. , MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORP. and others
Plaintiff_consolidated:
Charles Schenkenberger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MULLIN v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as NJ/3:16-cv-05388
Plaintiff:
JOAN MULLIN
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. , JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC , Johnson & Johnson Co. and others
MULLIN v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 3:2016cv05388
Plaintiff:
JOAN MULLIN
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joan Mullin v. Karen Balicki, et al
as 16-2896
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOAN MULLIN, Administratrix of the Estate of Robert Mullin, deceased and Joan Mullin, individually
Defendant - Appellee:
ADMINISTRATOR KAREN BALICKI, ROBERT PATERSON, DIRECTOR MARIE DUNLAP-PRYCE and others
Mullin v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00319
Plaintiff:
Joan Mullin
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Janssen Research & Development, LLC , Johnson & Johnson Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MULLINS et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2012cv01713
Plaintiff:
JOAN MULLINS and JANELLE PIERSALL
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ALBONDOZ, FOX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MULLIN v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2011cv00247
Plaintiff:
JOAN MULLIN
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY , THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY , SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON and others
Cross_claimant:
KINTOCK GROUP
Cross_defendant:
KINTOCK GROUP , ABC ENTITIES 1-10, ADMINISTRATOR KAREN BALICKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
