Cases 1 - 10 of 4,466
DUBERRY v. SCHMEZLIE et al
as 3:2025cv00516
Plaintiff:
ERIC JUBAR DUBERRY
Defendant:
(JANE) SCHMEZLIE, (JOHN) CARTER, (JOHN) GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KAUFFMAN v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2025cv00100
Plaintiff:
DAVID R. KAUFFMAN
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, LAURELL HARRY, DORINA VARNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv01998
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Rapaport v. Doe #1
as 25-841
Plaintiff:
GIDEON RAPAPORT
Defendant:
AJAY SRINIVASAN IYER, ZACHARY GEORGE GARRETT, RICHARD ALLEN EPSTEIN and others
Jones v. Vaughn et al
as 3:2025cv00531
Plaintiff:
Gregory D Jones
Defendant:
C Vaughn, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macklin v. Germak et al
as 3:2025cv00527
Plaintiff:
Derrick Macklin
Defendant:
C/O Germak, Ethan Clary, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hair v. Taylor et al
as 3:2025cv00269
Plaintiff:
James Hair
Defendant:
Lt. Taylor, Sgt. Hodges, Officer John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Godoy v. Doe 1 et al
as 1:2025cv21604
Plaintiff:
Javier Godoy
Defendant:
John Doe 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mayberry v. Pinckneyville Correctional Center et al
as 3:2025cv00511
Plaintiff:
Sharrod Mayberry
Defendant:
Pinckneyville Correctional Center, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garibay v. Adkins et al
as 2:2025cv02099
Plaintiff:
Frankie Garibay
Defendant:
Felicia Adkins, Z Pruett, . . Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
