Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Ragland v. Bennett
as 3:2023cv05574
Petitioner:
John Benton Ragland
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ochoa v. John Benton Model Fitness, LLC
as 4:2021cv00829
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Ochoa
Defendant:
John Benton Model Fitness, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Benton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv05728
Plaintiff:
John Benton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
KEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv53751
Plaintiff:
JOHN BENTON KEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BENTON et al v. AUROBINDO PHARMA, LTD. et al
as 1:2021cv15149
Plaintiff:
JOHN BENTON and MADELYN BENTON
Defendant:
AUROBINDO PHARMA, LTD., MYLAN LABORATORIES, LTD., MYLAN N.V. and others
In Re:
VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leake et al v. Harville et al
as 2:2019cv00082
Plaintiff:
Franklin Mabe, Inmates of Grainger County, John Benton and others
Defendant:
Chris Harville and James Harville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rich v. Moore et al
as 4:2018cv00624
Defendant:
Nic Karlstint, Chance Wynn and Harlen Moore
Plaintiff:
John Benton Rich, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rich v. Moore et al
as 6:2018cv00376
Defendant:
Nic Karlstint, Chance Wynn and Harlen Moore
Plaintiff:
John Benton Rich, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAVES GARRETT, LLC et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2018cv01447
Plaintiff:
GRAVES GARRETT, LLC and JOHN BENTON HURST
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Cross v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv03654
Plaintiff:
John Benton Cross, Jr.
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
