Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Ryan McFadyen v. Linwood Wilson
as 14-1499
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RYAN MCFADYEN, MATTHEW WILSON and BRECK ARCHER
Defendant - Appellant:
LINWOOD WILSON
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY, DUKE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, AARON GRAVES and others
Edward Carrington v. City of Durham
as 11-1465
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EDWARD CARRINGTON, CASEY J. CARROLL, MICHAEL P. CATALINO and others
Defendant:
STEVEN W. CHALMERS, PATRICK BAKER, RONALD HODGE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF DURHAM, MARK GOTTLIEB, BENJAMIN HIMAN and others
Edward Carrington v. Patrick Baker
as 11-1453
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EDWARD CARRINGTON, CASEY J. CARROLL, MICHAEL P. CATALINO and others
Defendant - Appellant:
PATRICK BAKER, STEVEN W. CHALMERS, RONALD HODGE and others
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY, DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, RICHARD BRODHEAD and others
Ryan McFadyen v. Patrick Baker
as 11-1458
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RYAN MCFADYEN, MATTHEW WILSON and BRECK ARCHER
Defendant - Appellant:
PATRICK BAKER, STEVEN W. CHALMERS, RONALD HODGE and others
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY, DUKE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, AARON GRAVES and others
Ryan McFadyen v. Patrick Baker
as 11-1460
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RYAN MCFADYEN, MATTHEW WILSON and BRECK ARCHER
Defendant - Appellant:
PATRICK BAKER, STEVEN W. CHALMERS, RONALD HODGE and others
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY, DUKE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, AARON GRAVES and others
CARRINGTON et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2008cv00119
Plaintiff:
EDWARD CARRINGTON, CASEY J. CARROLL, MICHAEL P. CATALINO and others
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY, DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., RICHARD BRODHEAD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCFADYEN et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2007cv00953
Plaintiff:
RYAN MCFADYEN, MATTHEW WILSON and BRECK ARCHER
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY, DUKE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPT., AARON GRAVES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
