Cases 1 - 10 of 19
DAVENPORT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv90124
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DAVENPORT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Los Segundos Borrachos, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01120
Defendant:
Los Segundos Borrachos, LLC, Louis D. Kowalski, IV, John Davenport and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
ABELL v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2015cv01049
Plaintiff:
ABELL, THOMAS ABELL, KATHARINE ADAMS-LOVE and others
Defendant:
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, THE ALLSTATE CORPORATION, AGENTS PENSION PLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Davenport v. Hutto Wood Products, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00940
Plaintiff:
Gary John Davenport
Defendant:
Hutto Wood Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Akhtar et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv00456
Plaintiff:
Jeff J Akhtar , Akhtar Housing Group LLC and Gurinda Akhtar
Defendant:
Glenn Johnson, Chris McMahon, Adam Anders and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Owens v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2016cv01405
Plaintiff:
Andrew Owens
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, City of Waterbury, Gary Angon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prock et al v. Liberty Fire Insurance Company, et al
as 4:2015cv00739
Plaintiff:
Mark Prock and Ana Prock
Defendant:
Liberty Fire Insurance Company and John Davenport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Myers v. Davenport et al
as 1:2013cv13149
Plaintiff:
Linda Myers
Defendant:
John Davenport and Megamillions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
