Cases 41 - 50 of 73
Halloran v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., et al
as 2:2014cv27004
Plaintiff:
Timothy Halloran
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. , Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. , John Doe#1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lescs v. Berkeley County Sheriffs Office et al
as 3:2014cv00096
Plaintiff:
Cecile M. Lescs
Defendant:
Berkeley County Sheriffs Office, Steerman, Walmart, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hensley et al v. Suttles et al
as 1:2014cv00193
Plaintiff:
Teresa Ann Hensley , H. H. and Rachelle Ferguson
Defendant:
Bobby R Suttles , Michael Scott Price , Keith Allen Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe 2 v. John Rosa
as 14-1748
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN DOE 2
Defendant - Appellee:
PRESIDENT JOHN W. ROSA, individually
Detore et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv13799
Plaintiff:
Meddie Detore and Gregg Detore
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STEWART v. LUNA et al
as 1:2014cv00230
Plaintiff:
TONY WRAY STEWART
Defendant:
KRISTEN LUNA, JONATHAN CATO, JUSTIN SHAFFER, SR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jefferson v. Kroger Limited Partnership I et al
as 3:2014cv00156
Plaintiff:
Sharon B. Jefferson
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I , Kroger Company , John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Reasoner v. Smith et al
as 2:2014cv00404
Plaintiff:
James Douglas Reasoner, III
Defendant:
Tracy Smith, Centraarchy Restaurant Management Company , Redwing LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Ellis v. Town of Hamlin et al
as 3:2013cv32115
Plaintiff:
Keith Ellis
Defendant:
Town of Hamlin, Chris Wilkinson, Napier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Doe 2 v. John Rosa
as 13-1785
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN DOE #2
Defendant - Appellant:
PRESIDENT JOHN W. ROSA, individually
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
