Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Sims v. Greenwood Motor Lines, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Davon Sims
Defendant:
Greenwood Motor Lines, Inc. doing business as R & L Carriers, Inc., Paul Alan Van Der Werken, R&L Transfer, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Star v. The Warehouse Bar and Grille, et al.
as 1:2020cv00950
Defendant:
The Warehouse Bar and Grille, et al., Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Star
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ivy v. T-Mobile US, Inc.
as 2:2019cv00243
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc., John Doe #2, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Ivy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gryder v. The Pointe at Stafford Apartments/Morgan Properties et al
as 1:2018cv01116
Defendant:
Stafford County Deputy "John Doe 4", The Fredericksburg, Va City Police Department, Deputies John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Ken Gryder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Foreman et al v. All Native, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00272
Plaintiff:
Ryan Foreman and Paula Foreman
Defendant:
All Native, Inc., All Native Services Company, All Native Solutions Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jefferson v. Kroger Limited Partnership I et al
as 3:2014cv00156
Plaintiff:
Sharon B. Jefferson
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I , Kroger Company , John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pinogy Corporation et al v. John Does 1 et al
as 1:2011cv01100
Plaintiff:
Pinogy Corporation and Robert Cook
Defendant:
John Does 1 and John Does 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Knight v. John Doe #1 et al
as 1:2010cv00887
Plaintiff:
Phillip W. Knight
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chaney v. Airserv Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv01015
Plaintiff:
Henry Lee Chaney
Defendant:
Airserv Corporation, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury/Airplane
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
