Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Holmes v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of South Carolina, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00004
Defendant:
John Doe #2, through John Doe #X, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
C. Holmes
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Honda of South Carolina Mfg., Inc. et al v. Doe 1 et al
as 4:2019cv00229
Plaintiff:
Honda of South Carolina Mfg Inc, Honda R&D Americas Inc, American Honda Motor Co Inc and others
Defendant:
John Doe 3, John Doe 2 and John Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services v. Askins et al
as 6:2018cv00844
Plaintiff:
South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services
Defendant:
Shirley Askins, Michelle Benson, Tammy DelaCruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Edwards v. Comtrak Logistics Inc et al
as 2:2013mc00116
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Edwards, Sr
Defendant:
Comtrak Logistics Inc, Wilkerson Trucking Company Inc, Phillip D Wilkerson and others
Edwards v. Comtrak Logistics Inc et al
as 2:2013mc00079
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Edwards, Sr
Defendant:
Comtrak Logistics Inc, Wilkerson Trucking Company Inc, Phillip D Wilkerson and others
Big Thyme Enterprises Inc v. David A Crotts & Associates Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00822
Plaintiff:
Big Thyme Enterprises Inc
Defendant:
David A Crotts & Associates Inc , David A Crotts , John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Abney et al v. Multiple Listing Service of Hilton Head Island Inc et al
as 9:2009cv01794
Plaintiff:
Roger L Abney, Roger L Abney, Roger L Abney and others
Defendant:
Multiple Listing Service of Hilton Head Island Inc, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Boland v. Consolidated Multiple Listings Service Inc et al
as 3:2009cv01335
Plaintiff:
Thomas Boland, Thomas Boland, Thomas Boland and others
Defendant:
Consolidated Multiple Listings Service Inc, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
