Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Garner v. Buckner et al
as 6:2023cv03335
Plaintiff:
Oscar Garner
Defendant:
Michele Buckner, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Corizon Health Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04078
Plaintiff:
Stephan D Woods
Defendant:
Corizon Health Inc., Centurion Managed Care, Anne L. Precythe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Precythe, et al
as 6:2023cv03068
Plaintiff:
Johnell A Bell
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Michele Buckner, Conrad Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dutcher v. Precythe et al
as 2:2022cv04124
Plaintiff:
Michael Dutcher
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Doris Falkenrath, Raina Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mainka v. Sheriffs Office et al
as 6:2022cv03223
Plaintiff:
Frank Mainka
Defendant:
Sheriff Office, Unknown Sex Offender Registry Officer, Unknown Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marks v. Precythe, et al.
as 6:2022cv03220
Plaintiff:
Wesley Everette Marks
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, LaDonna M Buckner, Billy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Precythe et al
as 6:2022cv03199
Plaintiff:
Johnell A Bell
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Michele Buckner, Christopher Meier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Danner v. Doe 1 et al
as 1:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Nathan Wayne Danner
Defendant:
Officer John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and John Doe 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Danner v. Doe 1 et al
as 6:2022cv03023
Plaintiff:
Nathan Wayne Danner
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and John Doe 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelums v. Newton County, Missouri et al
as 3:2021cv05036
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Cecil Nelums
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, Newton County, Missouri, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
