Cases 1 - 10 of 71
TAN v. DEFENDANT 1 et al
as 3:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
JONAH TAN
Defendant:
DEFENDANT 1 AKA "Agatha Li" and JOHN DOES 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Fitzgerald v. Doe, et al
as 2:2024cv00934
Defendant:
Defendant 1, John Does 1-20 and Lisa
Plaintiff:
George Edward Fitzgerald, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
MARTINEZ v. DEFENDANT 1 et al
as 3:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
JAMES MARTINEZ
Defendant:
AKA "Tim" DEFENDANT 1, AKA Janie Quintero DEFENDANT 2, AKA "Martin" DEFENDANT 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
FAULKNER v. DEFENDANT 1 et al
as 3:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
DONNAIRE FAULKNER
Defendant:
DEFENDANT 1 a/k/a XIANGMING CHEN, DEFENDANT 2 a/k/a MING CHEN, DEFENDANT 3 a/k/a YANG HAOYU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
AUSTRIA v. DEFENDANT 1 a/k/a Le et al
as 3:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
ALONA AUSTRIA
Defendant:
DEFENDANT 1 a/k/a Le and JOHN DOES 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
MYATT et al
as 2:2024cv00848
Not Yet Classified:
DEFENDANT 1, CINDY and John Does 1-20
Plaintiff:
DARYL MYATT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
AHMED v. DEFENDANT 1 et al
as 3:2024cv00123
Defendant:
DEFENDANT 1, EVANGELINE BROWN and JOHN DOES 1-20
Plaintiff:
IMDAD AHMED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
THORNTON v. DEFENDANT 1 et al
as 3:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. THORNTON
Defendant:
DEFENDANT 1 and JOHN DOES 1-20
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 25 Fraud - Commodities Leverage Contracts
JAMBULINGHAM v. DEFENDANT 1 et al
as 3:2024cv00116
Defendant:
DEFENDANT 1, DEFENDANT 2, AMEAD and others
Plaintiff:
HEMANTHKUMAR JAMBULINGHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
SALEM v. DEFENDANT 1 et al
as 3:2024cv00093
Defendant:
Defendant 1, Anna Asfahany and JOHN DOES 1-20
Plaintiff:
Nabil Dweib Salem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
