Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Merlino v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv04579
Defendant:
MEDICAL JOHN DOES, CORIZON HEALTH INC, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
Michele Merlino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Chavis v. John Delaney, et al
as 20-2174
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD CHAVIS
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, SUPERINTENDENT WAYMART SCI, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
HOCKETT v. THE GEO GROUP et al
as 2:2020cv02867
Defendant:
JOHN REILLY, JORDAN REILLY AND ASSOCIATES, JORDAN REILLY, ESQUIRE and others
Plaintiff:
MARCUS HOCKETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ESTATE OF STERLING COLE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv03924
Defendant:
ROBERT D TAYLOR, GERALD MAY, JOHN DOE 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF STERLING COLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROOKS v. NENNER et al
as 2:2017cv05568
Plaintiff:
DARRYL BROOKS
Defendant:
DAVID S. NENNER, CURTIS LEE, JOHN P. DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SUMMERS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv00191
Plaintiff:
WENDY SUMMERS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN P. DELANEY, WILLIAM LAWTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WIMBUSH v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv05783
Plaintiff:
GARY WIMBUSH
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , RICHARD ROSS, JR. , DEWEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv05717
Plaintiff:
DARRYL ANDERSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LOUIS GIORLA, JOHN P. DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KULB v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv04897
Plaintiff:
BRANDON KULB
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MILTON GIBBS, TERRANCE BAILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wayne Prater v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 16-1406
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAYNE PRATER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, COMMISSIONER OF (PPS) LOUIS GIORLA, DEPUTY WARDEN CFCF, WHITAKER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
