Cases 31 - 40 of 445
John Demos, Jr. v. State Supreme Court of Washington
as 23-35134
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON
Demos v Jackson
as 2:2023cv00272
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
Robert M Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Demos v. Pierce et al
as 4:2023cv05022
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Gary Pierce, Jennifer Adams, B Rohan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Demos, Jr. v. Jeffrey Immett, et al
as 23-35084
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY IMMETT, CEO General Electric Company, DOUG MCMILLON, CEO Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and JOHN WATSON, CEO Chevron Corporation
Demos v. Pierce et al
as 3:2023cv05070
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Gary Pierce, Jennifer Adams, B Rohan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Demos, Jr. v. William Barker, et al
as 23-35027
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM BARKER, Associate Superintendent, ROBERT JACKSON, Superintendent, DAVID WINDOW, Correctional Captain and others
Demos v. State of Washington
as 2:2023cv00058
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. Jackson
as 2:2023cv00057
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
Robert M Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. McCarthy
as 2:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Kevin J McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Demos v. Scalise
as 2:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Steve Scalise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
