Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Moya v. City of Alpharetta et al
as 1:2022cv02942
Plaintiff:
Travis Moya
Defendant:
City of Alpharetta, John Robison, R. A. Splawn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Newey et al
as 1:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
Mikel Ray Brown and Mikel Brown
Defendant:
Reid Newey, John Robison, Blake Haycock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ericksen et al v. Newey et al
as 1:2021cv00153
Plaintiff:
Alena Ericksen and Mikel Brown
Defendant:
Reid Newey, John Robison, Marie Stevenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Legg et al
as 1:2020cv01912
Plaintiff:
Rose Campbell
Defendant:
Chief John Robison, Michael Swerdlove, Alpharetta Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02751
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert King v. Dennis Schrader
as 17-7242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT JOSEPH KING
Defendant - Appellee:
DENNIS R. SCHRADER, Acting Secretary of Health, JOHN ROBISON, Chief Executive Officer, Clifton T. Perkins Hospital Center, In His Individual and Official Capacity, THOMAS LEWIS, Chief Operating Officer, Clifton T. Perkins Hospital Center, In His Individual and Official Capacity and others
King v. Mitchell et al
as 8:2016cv03804
Plaintiff:
Robert Joseph King
Defendant:
Van T. Mitchell , John Robison , Thomas Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Bukstel v. Jehu Hand, et al
as 15-3301
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD BUKSTEL
Defendant - Appellee:
JEHU HAND, DYLAN J. STEINBERG, JOHN S. STAPLETON and others
BUKSTEL v. HAND et al
as 2:2015cv03951
Plaintiff:
EDWARD BUKSTEL
Defendant:
JEHU HAND, DYLAN STEINBERG , JOHN STAPLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
