Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Point Zero 0, Inc. et al v. Tyson
as 1:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Point Zero 0, Inc., Green Mountain Industries, Inc. and Roy Vasquez
Defendant:
John Tyson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Zero Point 0 Inc. et al v. Tyson
as 1:2022cv02970
Plaintiff:
Zero Point 0, Inc., Green Mountain Industries, Inc. and Roy Vasquez
Defendant:
John Tyson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Sullen v. Butler et al
as 1:2022cv00404
Plaintiff:
Willie A Sullen
Defendant:
Charles R. Butler, David Barnett, Chris Galanos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HEAGY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv10994
Plaintiff:
JOHN TYSON HEAGY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bishop v. Funderburk et al
as 3:2021cv00679
Plaintiff:
Dan Bishop
Defendant:
Amy L Funderburk, Paul Newby, Robin Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sullen v. Butler et al
as 2:2021cv01574
Plaintiff:
Willie A Sullen
Defendant:
Charles R Butler, David Barnett, Chris Galanos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEAGY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv15290
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN TYSON HEAGY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TYSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv63217
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN TYSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sullen v. Hogan et al
as 1:2020cv00095
Defendant:
David Barnett, Mobile Bar Association, JoJo Schwarzauer and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Arthur Sullen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. St. Paul Travelers Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01454
Defendant:
Lyons Exit Realty Inc., Counselor Kessel, Nurse Blackmon and others
Plaintiff:
Edmond Hudmond Smith, IV and Louis Holger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
