Cases 1 - 10 of 24
MORGAN v. CROTHERS et al
as 3:2025cv04230
Petitioner:
JONATHAN MORGAN
Respondent:
J. CROTHERS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MORGAN v. CROTHERS
as 2:2025cv04230
Petitioner:
JONATHAN MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
J'Adore, LLC v. Morgan et al
as 1:2024cv11038
Plaintiff:
J'Adore, LLC
Defendant:
Jonathan Morgan and JB Morgan, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6347
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lopez et al v. City of Santa Rosa et al
as 3:2022cv05270
Plaintiff:
Angelina Lopez, Neyo Alvarez, Seserina Alvarez and others
Defendant:
City of Santa Rosa, Matthew Crosbie, Jonathan Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pickens v. Morgan
as 5:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
Brandon Pickens
Defendant:
Jonathan Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Peterson, Jonathan v. Benzel, Jason et al
as 3:2021cv00799
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Morgan Peterson
Defendant:
Warden Jason Benzel, Deputy Wardem Daisy Chase, Security Director B. Greff and others
Not Classified By Court:
DCI Prison Facility and WCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Liberty Insurance Corporation et al
as 3:2021cv02611
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Morgan
Defendant:
Liberty Insurance Corporation and California Closets Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Morgan
as 21-2152
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jonathan L. Morgan, AKA ilikyoung, AKA John Morgan, AKA Jonathan Morgan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
