Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Wood v. Hawkin et al
as 8:2024cv00950
Plaintiff:
Charity Noelle Wood
Defendant:
Jonathan Robert Hawkin and Paul Showalter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClain v. Stacy et al
as 3:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Robert McClain
Defendant:
Dr. Stacy, Nurse Kim, Teresa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClain v. Losch
as 3:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Robert McClain
Defendant:
Steve P. Losch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClain v. Losch
as 3:2023cv00570
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Robert McClain
Defendant:
Steve P. Losch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClain v. Stacy et al
as 3:2023cv00542
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Robert McClain
Defendant:
Stacy, Lt. Kim, Teresa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GAUTHIER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv03902
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN ROBERT GAUTHIER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CARR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv01634
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN ROBERT CARR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GILLIE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv22733
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN ROBERT GILLIE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HORTEMILLER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv12428
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN ROBERT HORTEMILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. ROBERTS et al
as 2:2023cv00778
Plaintiff:
DAMIAN MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant:
TROOPER ADAM ROBERTS, TROOPER BRIAN ROBERTS, TROOPER CHADWICK ROBERTS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
