Cases 1 - 10 of 141
Ruiz-Hernandez v. McHenry
as 25-220
Petitioner:
JOSE RUIZ-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Wonderful Nurseries LLC v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board et al
as 1:2024cv01601
Defendant:
Santiago Avila-Gomez, Victoria Hassid, Cinthia Flores and others
Plaintiff:
Wonderful Nurseries LLC
Intervenor:
Claudia Chavez, Maria Ester Gutierrez, Francisco Antonio and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Jose Ruiz v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv06742
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Tyco Fire Products LP and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Poslof v. Arce et al
as 5:2024cv06004
Defendant:
R. Gamboa, J. Ortega, Angelo and others
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Lee Poslof, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Youngers, et al v. City of Albuquerque, et al
as 24-2096
Defendant:
CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE, a New Mexico municipality and JOSE RUIZ, in his individual capacity
Plaintiff:
JOLEEN K. YOUNGERS, as limited conservator for MAX MITNIK and MICHAEL MITNIK, individually, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Wanda Mitnik, Deceased
Bain v. Morales et al
as 0:2024cv61164
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bain
Defendant:
Kent Finch, Jose Ruiz and Elizabeth Morales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. Jose Rivera
as 24-6518
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOSE RUIZ RIVERA, a/k/a Miguelito, a/k/a Miguel
Ruiz v. The Bradford Exchange, Ltd.
as 24-3378
Plaintiff:
JOSE RUIZ
Defendant:
THE BRADFORD EXCHANGE, LTD.
Ruiz v. The Bradford Exchange, Ltd.
as 24-3372
Respondent:
JOSE RUIZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Petitioner:
THE BRADFORD EXCHANGE, LTD.
Jones (PS) v. Deines et al
as 1:2024cv01429
Defendant:
Curtis Deines, April Ogley, Randi Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
