Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Amatucci v. Greenhalgh
as 1:2021cv00238
Defendant:
Charles Greenhalgh
Plaintiff:
Josephine Amatucci
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Amatucci v. Mullen et al
as 1:2021cv00237
Defendant:
Daniel Mullen, US District Court-NH, District Judge and Ransmeier & Spellman
Plaintiff:
Josephine Amatucci
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Amatucci v. US District Court-NH, District Judge
as 1:2020cv01194
Plaintiff:
Josephine Amatucci
Defendant:
US District Court-NH, District Judge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Amatucci v. US District Court-NH, District Judge
as 1:2020cv00934
Plaintiff:
Josephine Amatucci
Defendant:
US District Court-NH, District Judge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Amatucci v. Wolfeboro, NH, Town of et al
as 1:2020cv00449
Defendant:
Judy Estes, Steve Champaign, Timothy Morgan and others
Plaintiff:
Josephine Amatucci
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Amatucci v. Young, et al
as 19-1969
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD M. YOUNG, JR., Chief Deputy Sheriff, Carroll County Sheriff's Department, MICHAEL BEDLEY, Sergeant, Carroll County Sheriff's Department, DEAN RONDEAU, Police Chief, Wolfeboro Police Department and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPHINE AMATUCCI
Amatucci v. Wolfeboro, NH, Town of et al
as 1:2019cv00531
Defendant:
Wolfeboro, NH, Town of, William Wright, Belknap County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Josephine Amatucci
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amatucci v. Rondeau et al
as 1:2019cv00156
Defendant:
Steve Champaign, Timothy Morgan, Dean Rondeau and others
Plaintiff:
Josephine Amatucci
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Amatucci v. Town of Wolfeboro, NH
as 19-1157
Defendant / Appellee:
WOLFEBORO, NH
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPHINE AMATUCCI
Amatucci v. Chase, et al
as 19-1109
Defendant:
WOLFEBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT, TIMOTHY MORGAN, JAMES O'BRIEN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPHINE AMATUCCI
Defendant / Appellee:
WOLFEBORO, NH and STUART CHASE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
