Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Friesel v. Bank of America, N.A et al
as 7:2024cv02346
Plaintiff:
Cheskel Friesel
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A and JP Morgan Chase, N.A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01120
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Griffith-Fenton v. JP Morgan Chase N.A.
as 7:2018cv11031
Plaintiff:
Beverley Griffith-Fenton
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Avery v. WJM Development Corp. et al
as 1:2018cv08703
Defendant:
Lucien Martin, Stacey Martin, WJM Development Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Linda Avery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association v. Levin, et al
as 2:2015cv02773
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase N.A., John Doe #1 through John Doe #12 and Ofra Levin
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Fernandez v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2014cv04510
Plaintiff:
Jose Fernandez
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
DeBiase et al v. JP Morgan Chase, N.A.
as 1:2012cv06902
Plaintiff:
Nicholas R. DeBiase and Lucian R. Rawls
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Torres et al v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 1:2012cv00963
Plaintiff:
Joseph Torres , Bernard Torres and Charlotte Torres
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co. and JP Morgan Chase, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
