Cases 1 - 10 of 53
McBride v. YA'cup et al
as 1:2024cv01072
Plaintiff:
Dytaniel McBride and Dytaniel L McBride
Defendant:
John R YA'cup, Brian L Berntson, Bradley Dixon and others
Interested Party:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gehrking, Robert et al v. Bank of America, NA et al
as 3:2022cv00356
Plaintiff:
Robert R Gehrking, Robert R. Gehrking and Gehrking Family Revocable Living Trust
Defendant:
Bank of America, NA and JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
PETITT v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA et al
as 1:2022cv00641
Plaintiff:
Anita Petitt
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA, FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF RICHMOND and CBRE INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Lim v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 2:2021cv01277
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, Goh Chok Tong, President Barack Obama and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03226
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00495
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Lintner v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
as 4:2019cv00092
Plaintiff:
Marjorie F Lintner
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hudson v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA et al
as 1:2019cv01284
Defendant:
United States of America, JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA, Housing and Urban Development and others
Plaintiff:
Diana S Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02605
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Ellis et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
as 2:2019cv00879
Plaintiff:
Darryl Darvi Ellis and James Ellis
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
