Cases 1 - 10 of 134
Pippin v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 4:2024cv00552
Plaintiff:
James Pippin
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 American Disabilities Act of 1990
Lowell Robinson, Jr. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 23-16071
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOWELL ROBINSON, Jr., Master Sergeant USMC, Retired
Defendant / Appellee:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., LEANDRO GUILLEN, Loan Advisor, JOYA LEWIS, Loan Associate and others
Nowak v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 2:2023cv05783
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. and JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Plaintiff:
Martin Nowak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nowak v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2023cv05898
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Plaintiff:
Martin Nowak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
