Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01924
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
COE v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY et al
as 1:2019cv03911
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE Y. COE
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and J.P. MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02955
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HEATH v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv01208
Defendant:
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. EMPLOYEE WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL HEATH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
MUNCIE SANITARY DISTRICT v. JACKSON et al
as 1:2016cv00711
Plaintiff:
MUNCIE SANITARY DISTRICT
Defendant:
JACKSON, JAMIE GREGORY, EK PROPERTIES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
BRACKENS v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
as 4:2018cv00072
Plaintiff:
STEVEN BRACKENS
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
LINDSEY v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. EMPLOYEE WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN et al
as 1:2018cv00466
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. EMPLOYEE WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN and PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
ADRIANNE LINDSEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02874
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
IN RE: MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA
as 1:2017mc00069
Petitioner:
BADLANDS NGLS LLC
In Re:
MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA ISSUED TO NON-PARTY JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03017
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
