Cases 41 - 50 of 83
Close v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
as 1:2012cv04230
Plaintiff:
Judy Darlene Close
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
Davis v. JPMorgan Chase Bank
as 1:2012cv04126
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline K. Davis
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Robinson v. JPMorgan Chase Bank National Association et al
as 6:2012cv00109
Plaintiff:
Tonia L. Robinson
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank National Association , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and Barrett Daffiin Frappier LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Bradley et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association et al
as 1:2012cv03847
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Bradley and Cherrye Bradley
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association and Chase Home Finance, LLC
Cook v. Citibank, N.A. et al
as 1:2012cv03765
Plaintiff:
Victoria E. Cook
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A. , EMC Mortgage Corporation and Chase
Movant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Matthews v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2012cv03757
Plaintiff:
Al Matthews
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Penn v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
as 1:2012cv03738
Plaintiff:
Paul Penn, Jr.
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
Harden v. JPMorgan Chase Bank National Association et al
as 1:2012cv03327
Plaintiff:
Sebrenia S. Harden
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank National Association, Chase Home Finance, McCalla Raymer LLC and others
Barber v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association et al
as 1:2012cv03142
Plaintiff:
Annie Ruth Barber
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, Wells Fargo Bank N.A., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
BALL et al v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NA
as 1:2012cv00132
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY FRANK BALL, JR and TEMPIE BALL
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
