Cases 1 - 10 of 18
In Re: Subpoena Duces Tecum on Houlihan Lokey, Inc.
as 6:2012cv02158
Plaintiff:
JPS Elastomerics Corporation and JPS Industries Inc
Defendant:
Jones Day
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Subpoena Duces Tecum on Houlihan Lokey, Inc.
as 2:2012cv06087
Plaintiff:
JPS Elastomerics Corporation and JPS Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Jones Day
In Re:
Subpoena Duces Tecum on Houlihan Lokey, Inc.
Schmidt et al v. JPS Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv04559
Plaintiff:
Lawrence R. Schmidt and LR Schmidt Associates
Defendant:
JPS Industries, Inc. and JPS Elastomerics Corp.
Schmidt et al v. JPS Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2011mi00138
Plaintiff:
Lawrence R. Schmidt and LR Schmidt Associates
Defendant:
JPS Industries, Inc. and JPS Elastomerics Corp.
JPS Elastomerics Corporation et al v. Jones Day
as 6:2011cv02960
Plaintiff:
JPS Elastomerics Corporation and JPS Industries Inc
Defendant:
Jones Day
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wake County Board of Education v. Dow Roofing Systems, LLC
as 11-1742
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAKE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION
Defendant - Appellee:
DOW ROOFING SYSTEMS, LLC and JPS ELASTOMERICS CORPORATION
Schmidt et al v. JPS Industries Inc et al
as 6:2011cv01046
Plaintiff:
Lawrence R Schmidt and LR Schmidt Associates
Defendant:
JPS Industries Inc and JPS Elastomerics Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kmart Corporation v. Dow Roofing Systems, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv01310
Plaintiff:
Kmart Corporation
Defendant:
Dow Roofing Systems, LLC, Stevens Roofing Systems, JPS Elastomerics and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JPS Elastomerics Corp. v. Specialized Technology Resourc
as 11-1153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JPS ELASTOMERICS CORP.
Defendant - Appellee:
SPECIALIZED TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES, INC.
Wake County Board of Education v. Dow Roofing Systems, LLC et al
as 5:2011cv00010
Plaintiff:
Wake County Board of Education
Defendant:
Dow Roofing Systems, LLC and JPS Elastomerics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
