Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Justin Ringgold-Lockhart, et al v. Providence Health & Services, et al
as 21-56323
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTIN RINGGOLD-LOCKHART, As Personal Representative of the Estate of Eddye Melaragno and NINA RINGGOLD, In the Capacity As A Named Agent Under Advance Health Care Directive And In Her Individual Capacity
Defendant / Appellee:
PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES and DOES, 1-10
Justin Ringgold-Lockhart, et al v. Providence Health & Services, et al
as 21-56324
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN RINGGOLD-LOCKHART, As Personal Representative of the Estate of Eddye Melaragno
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NINA RINGGOLD, In the Capacity As A Named Agent Under Advance Health Care Directive And In Her Individual Capacity
Defendant / Appellee:
PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES and DOES, 1-10
Justin Ringgold-Lockhart as Personal Representative of the Estate of Eddye Melaragno et al v. Nikourai et al
as 2:2019cv05598
Plaintiff:
Matthew Melaragno, Justin Ringgold-Lockhart and Nina R Ringgold
Petitioner:
Justin Ringgold-Lockhart as Personal Representative of the Estate of Eddye Melaragno
Defendant:
Arash Nikourai, Uslan Daniel, Regents of The University of California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Justin Ringgold Lockhart et al v. Arash Nikourai et al

as 2:2019cv05601
Plaintiff:
Justin Ringgold-Lockhart as Personal Representative of the Estate of Eddye Melaragno, Matthew Melaragno, Justin Ringgold-Lockhart and others
Defendant:
Daniel Uslan, Arash Nikourai, Regents of The University of California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Justin Ringgold-Lockhart as Personal Representative of the Estate of Eddye Melaragno et al v. Nikourai et al
as 2:2019cv05600
Plaintiff:
Justin Ringgold-Lockhart as Personal Representative of the Estate of Eddye Melaragno, Matthew Melaragno and Nina R Ringgold
Defendant:
Arash Nikourai, Uslan Daniel, Regents of The University of California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.