Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02522
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Thomas v. Correct Health Bartow, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00125
Defendant:
Shalisha Fisher, Clark Millsap, George Noland and others
Plaintiff:
Jack Harold Thomas, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2021cv00012
Defendant:
Inmate Trust Fund, Internal Revenue Service and NFN Glenn
Plaintiff:
Jack Herbert Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2020cv00216
Petitioner:
Jack Herbert Thomas
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. USAA Investment Management Company
as 3:2020cv01960
Defendant:
USAA Investment Management Company and USAA Financial Planning Services Insurance Agency
Plaintiff:
Jack A Thomas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
Thomas v. Unknown Defendants
as 2:2020cv00133
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants, Physician's Assistant Eastridge, Warden Anders and others
Plaintiff:
Jack Herbert Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 6:2016cv00333
Plaintiff:
Jack James Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Jack Thoma
as 13-1819
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JACK LEWIS THOMAS
Reedy, et al v. Werholtz
as 11-3040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL E. REEDY, TODD DEAL, GRANT NIXON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER WERHOLTZ, Secretary of Corrections, Kansas Department of Corrections
United States of America v. Jack G Thomas et al
as 8:2010cv01801
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing Inc, Jack G Thomas and Lynda D Thomas
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
