Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Waseem Daker v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-13161
Defendant:
OTIS STANTON, Former Statewide Tier Coordinator, ADRIAN NELSON, Statewide Tier Coordinator, ROBERT TOOLE, Field Operations Director and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 24-13121
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
JACK KOON, AHMAD HOLT, SHARON LEWIS and others
Waseem Daker v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-13104
Defendant:
GREGORY DOZIER, STEVE UPTON, JACK KOON and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Waseem Daker v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-13074
Defendant:
AHMAD HOLT, Deputy Field Operations Director, ADRIAN NELSON, Statewide Tier Coordinator, ROBERT TOOLE, Field Operations Director and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 23-11445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Waseem Daker v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-10798
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACK KOON, STEVE UPON and others
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 23-10630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Homer Bryson, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, GREGORY DOZIER, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
