Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Torres v. Jones et al
as 6:2020cv00614
Defendant:
Warden Jacqueline Jones, FNU Barker, Sgt. FNU Nettles and others
Plaintiff:
Amelia Marie Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv01120
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kenneth Taylor v. Bryan Coller et al.
as 3:2017cv00358
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Taylor
Defendant:
Bryan Coller, Jacqueline Jones and Eric C. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. Livingston et al
as 3:2015cv00321
Plaintiff:
Manuel Caudillo Ramirez
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Steve Massie, Jacqueline Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2013cv03549
Plaintiff:
James Dennis Perkins
Defendant:
City of Garland Police Department, City of Garland Police Chief, Rick Thaler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Hudspeth et al
as 4:2013cv02924
Plaintiff:
James Dennis Perkins
Defendant:
Monty Hudspeth and Jacqueline Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2013cv02022
Plaintiff:
James Dennis Perkins
Defendant:
City of Garland Police Department, City of Garland Police Chief, Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
as 3:2011cv01267
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Jones and Kenneth Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hines, et al. v. GlaxoSmithKline, Inc., et al.
as 4:2009cv01132
Plaintiff:
Fay Hines, Paula Chancey, Carolyn Bell and others
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, Inc. and Glaxosmithkline, PLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
