Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 326
Bryan Estrada v. Jacqueline Lashbrook
as 18-2201
Petitioner - Appellant: BRYAN ESTRADA
Respondent - Appellee: JACQUELINE LASHBROOK
Gregory Conway v. Michael Scott, et al
as 18-2186
Plaintiff - Appellant: GREGORY CONWAY
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL SCOTT, Pinckneyville CC, Doctor, JACQUELINE LASHBROOK, Pinckneyville CC, Warden, ABBY ELDER, Pinckneyville CC, Medical Technician and others
Huff v. Lashbrook et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv01160
Plaintiff: James Huff
Defendant: Jacqueline Lashbrook, Kimberly Butler, Warden Page and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Austin v. Spiller et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv01152
Plaintiff: Lazerek Austin
Defendant: William Spiller, S. Gee, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric Henry v. Jacqueline Lashbrook
as 18-2145
Petitioner - Appellant: ERIC HENRY
Respondent - Appellee: JACQUELINE LASHBROOK
Ortega v. Lashbrook et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv03631
Petitioner: Michael Ortega
Respondent: Jacqueline Lashbrook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dennis Fitts v. Jacqueline Lashbrook
as 18-2129
Petitioner - Appellant: DENNIS FITTS
Respondent - Appellee: JACQUELINE LASHBROOK
Monroe v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv01052
Plaintiff: Steven D. Monroe
Defendant: Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., John R. Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joshua Davis v. Mrs. Rodely, et al
as 18-1944
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOSHUA J. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee: MRS. RODELY, WOOD, POLICE OFFICER COWEN and others
Keith Sanders v. Jacqueline Lashbrook
as 18-1928
Petitioner - Appellant: KEITH A. SANDERS
Respondent - Appellee: JACQUELINE LASHBROOK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?