Cases 1 - 10 of 140
Freeman v. Collier et al
as 1:2025cv00277
Plaintiff:
James Freeman
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, James Danheim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FREEMAN-NEELY v. SMITH
as 5:2025cv01088
Petitioner:
JAMES FREEMAN-NEELY
Respondent:
WARDEN JEFFERY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv10238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Callicotte et al v. Collier et al
as 1:2024cv00465
Defendant:
Siedah Thomas, James Danheim, Tina Tompkins and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Colby Callicotte, Jessie Jones Calloway, James Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Saunders et al
as 1:2024cv00370
Defendant:
John Doe, Frank Saunders and FNU Smith
Plaintiff:
James Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Gutierrez
as 4:2024cv00129
Petitioner:
James Freeman
Respondent:
M Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Freeman v. Frontline Asset Strategies LLC
as 7:2023cv01451
Plaintiff:
James Freeman
Defendant:
Frontline Asset Strategies LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gibson v. Oconee County Sheriffs Office et al
as 8:2022cv03158
Plaintiff:
Chad Austin Gibson
Defendant:
Oconee County Sheriffs Office, School District of Oconee County, Jesus De Luna Soto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blain et al v. California Department of Transportation et al
as 3:2022cv04178
Plaintiff:
Jackson Blain, John Janosko, Kellie Castillo and others
Defendant:
Governor Gavin Newsom, County of Alameda, California Department of Transportation, Toks Omishakin, Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
