Cases 1 - 10 of 1,376
Smith v. United States of America
as 8:2025cv00872
Plaintiff:
James Eugene Smith
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Smith v. Medical Director et al
as 3:2025cv00177
Defendant:
James Arthur Smith and Medical Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Smith, Jr. v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2025pq00396
Plaintiff:
James S. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Does 1 through 60 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Crawley v. Adkins, et al
as 25-3055
Plaintiff:
ANNETTE K. CRAWLEY
Defendant:
DAREN LEE ADKINS, DENISE BANNING, STEVEN J. BOOK and others
Smith v. Olvera, et al.
as 25-1809
Plaintiff:
JAMES DRISCOLL SMITH
Defendant:
BRIAN OLVERA, JOSHUA TAYLOR and JACOB BALLENSKY
Banner Bank v. Smith, et al
as 25-4030
Appellant:
BANNER BANK, successor by merger of AmericanWest Bank which formerly did business in Utah as, FDBA Far West Bank
Counter-Claimant:
JAMES M. SMITH, a Utah resident and LOREE C. SMITH, an individual
Crawley v. Adkins et al
as 5:2025cv04022
Plaintiff:
Annette K. Crawley
Defendant:
Daren Lee Adkins, Denise Banning, Steven J. Book and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v. Richerson Tx Police Dept Aressting Officers and Witness et al
as 3:2025cv00508
Plaintiff:
James Donald Smith
Defendant:
Richerson Tx Police Dept Aressting Officers and Witness, Aressting Officers Richerson PD Texas and Crowd of On Looking Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Richerson Texas Police Arresting Officers
as 3:2025cv00499
Plaintiff:
James Donald Smith
Defendant:
Richerson Texas Police Arresting Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
