Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Norwood v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2025cv00140
Plaintiff:
James Norwood
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Norwood v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01246
Plaintiff:
James Norwood
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Norwood v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00787
Plaintiff:
James Norwood
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Edward Norwood v. Kilolo Kijakazi

as 21-3560
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Edward James Norwood
Defendant / Appellee:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Thomas v. Caddo Parish

as 5:2021cv03452
Plaintiff:
Christopher G Thomas
Defendant:
Sheriffs Dept Caddo Parish, Officer E Parker, Officer R Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NORWOOD v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv00648
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES NORWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norwood v. 3M Company et al.
as 0:2021cv00879
Defendant:
Aearo Holding LLC, Aearo Intermediate LLC, Aearo Technologies LLC and others
Plaintiff:
James Norwood
Norwood v. Social Security Administration

as 4:2020cv01177
Plaintiff:
Edward James Norwood
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
NORWOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv06730
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES NORWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hutching v. Andrews
as 5:2019hc02162
Respondent:
Justin Andrews
Petitioner:
James Norwood Hutching
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.