Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
HARRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv11832
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES R HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv11664
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Harris v. Social Security
as 2:2015cv13435
Plaintiff:
James R. Harris
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
James R. Harris v. Carey Canada, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:10-CV-69203
Plaintiff:
James R. Harris
Defendant:
Carey Canada, Inc
HARRIS v. CAREY CANADA, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv69203
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. HARRIS
Defendant:
CAREY CANADA, INC. and CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Great West Casualty Company v. JAT Trucking of Illinois Inc et al
as 2:2010cv02012
Plaintiff:
Great West Casualty Company
Defendant:
JAT Trucking of Illinois Inc, Personal Care Insurance of Illinois Plan of JAT, Gayle Frerichs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
HARRIS v. AC & S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv92710
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. HARRIS
Defendant:
AC & S, INC., AC & S, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
v. TOWELS et al
as 4:2009cv00345
Defendant:
CARLIN A TOWELS, SR., JAMES R HARRIS, DORIS MALOY and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403 Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien
James R Harris v. Michael J Astrue
as 5:2009cv01518
Plaintiff:
James R Harris
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue, Michael J Astrue and Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
