Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 389
Robinson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 3:2025cv00241
Petitioner: Harry James Robinson, Jr.
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Corewest Resources LLC-FZ et al v. Gideon Group Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv03613
Plaintiff: South Oil LLP and Corewest Resources LLC-FZ
Defendant: Salman Khan, James Robinson, Gideon Group Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
USA v. Robinson
as 24-30778
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: James Robinson
Robinson v. Bay Area Rapid Transit District et al
as 3:2024cv08788
Defendant: Mark Conner, Bay Area Rapid Transit District and Nico Lazzara
Plaintiff: James Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Aspen Construction Company Corporation
as 7:2024cv00061
Defendant: Aspen Construction Company Corporation
Plaintiff: James Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Robinson et al v. J.B. Pritzker et al
as 1:2024cv10068
Plaintiff: zviad dzamashvili and James Robinson
Defendant: J.B. Pritzker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Robinson v. Crabtree et al
as 5:2024cv01247
Defendant: Barr, Allen, T Schult and others
Plaintiff: Lutha James Robinson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Terry et al (MAG+) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00358
Defendant: John Q. Hamm, Steve Marshall and Alcornelia Terry
Plaintiff: James Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11446
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
William Abner v. US
as 24-1492
Plaintiff: RICHARD HARVEY, JOHN MARCUM, EDGAR NEFF and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?