Cases 1 - 10 of 177
Cartwright, Teshon v. Washington et al
as 0:2025cv61030
Plaintiff:
Teshon Cartwright and Te
Defendant:
James Washington, Broward Sheriff's Office, Lieutenant Xo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Skyles Law Group et al
as 2:2025cv00561
Plaintiff:
Jane Mary Nile Porter
Defendant:
Skyles Law Group, Robby Lamers, Kyle Johns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv02863
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Washington v. Real Property Management Main et al
as 4:2025cv10543
Plaintiff:
James Washington
Defendant:
Real Property Management Main, Scott and Rick
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Washington v. Ellis et al
as 3:2025cv00055
Plaintiff:
James Washington
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety and Corrections and Emmanuel Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Williams (Washington)
as 24-3173
Defendant:
ANTOINE WRIGHT, RONALD GLEN DAVIS, WILLIAM BYNUM and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hollis et al v. Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois
as 5:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
James Washington, Leland Hollis and Michelle Hollis
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
United States of America v. Williams (Davis)
as 24-1425
Defendant:
RONALD GLEN DAVIS, TERRENCE WILLIAMS, ALAN ANDERSON and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Williams (Bynum)
as 24-1337
Defendant:
WILLIAM BYNUM, ALAN ANDERSON, TERRENCE WILLIAMS and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
