Cases
FROST v. KNIZER et al
as 1:2021cv03046
Plaintiff: JAMES WILLIAM FROST, JR.
Defendant: KNIZER, WESTFORD MEDICAL and PENDLETON CORR FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FROST v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2015cv00286
Plaintiff: JAMES WILLIAMS FROST, JR.
Defendant: INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and DUSHAN ZATECKY
Miscellaneou: PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Frost v. Pite Duncan, LLP, et al
as 10-16389
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES WILLIAM FROST
Defendant - Appellee: PITE DUNCAN, LLP, WILLIAM L. PATRIDGE, in his official and private capacity, SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SONOMA and others
FROST v. AURORA LOAN SERVICING, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv02476
Plaintiff: James William Frost
Defendant: Aurora Loan Servicing, LLC and Aurora Bank FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Frost v. Aurora Loan Servicing, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv02476
Plaintiff: James William Frost
Defendant: Aurora Loan Servicing, LLC and Aurora Bank FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FROST v. PITE DUNCAN, LLP et al
as 3:2009cv05780
Plaintiff: JAMES WILLIAM FROST
Defendant: PITE DUNCAN, LLP, WILLIAM L. PATRIDGE, SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SONOMA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
FROST v. PITE DUNCAN, LLP et al
as 1:2009cv01896
Plaintiff: JAMES WILLIAM FROST
Defendant: PITE DUNCAN, LLP, WILLIAM L. PATRIDGE, SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SONOMA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Type: Real Property None
FROST v. AURORA LOAN SERVICING, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv01701
Plaintiff: JAMES WILLIAM FROST
Defendant: AURORA LOAN SERVICING, LLC and AURORA BANK FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?