Cases 1 - 10 of 180
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
USA v. James Williams
as 23-3284
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES D. WILLIAMS
Taylor v. International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, et al.
as 23-3842
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM TAYLOR
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES, STEVE BIGELOW, LUIS F. ROBLES and others
USA v. Williams
as 23-50725
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
James Demoung Williams
US v. James Williams
as 23-4565
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES ANTHONY WILLIAMS
Ou-Young v. County of Santa Clara
as 4:2023mc80222
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao Paul Ou-Young
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara, Jeffrey F. Rosen, John Chase and others
USA v. James Williams
as 23-11088
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES CLIFFORD WILLIAMS
Ou-Young v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 3:2023mc80093
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young and Kuang-Bao Paul Ou-Young
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara, Jeffrey F. Rosen, John Chase and others
Kuang-Bao Ou-Young v. USDC-CASJ
as 23-70035
Not Classified By Court:
In re: KUANG-BAO OU-YOUNG, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, JEFFREY F. ROSEN, District Attorney, County of Santa Clara and others
Petitioner:
KUANG-BAO OU-YOUNG
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE
Kuang-Bao Ou-Young v. USDC-CASJ
as 23-70016
Not Classified By Court:
In re: KUANG-BAO OU-YOUNG, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, JEFFREY F. ROSEN, District Attorney, County of Santa Clara and others
Petitioner:
KUANG-BAO OU-YOUNG
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
