Cases 1 - 10 of 178
Bell v. Dauzat
as 24-30067
Petitioner:
James A. Bell
Respondent:
Michele Dauzat, Warden, David Wade Correctional Center and Michele Dauzat, Warden , David Wade Correctional Center
Lasorsa v. Bell
as 5:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Ronald S. Lasorsa
Defendant:
James Edward Bell, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund v. Dimon et al
as 1:2023cv03903
Plaintiff:
Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund and City of Miami General Employees & Sanitation Employees Retirement Trust
Defendant:
James Dimon, Ashley Bacon, Linda B. Bammann and others
Nominal Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Todd A. Combs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
US v. James Bell
as 23-6420
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES SPENCER BELL
Bell v. Goodwin
as 3:2022cv01902
Plaintiff:
James A Bell
Defendant:
Jerry Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brittany Hyre Anculle, et al v. USA
as 22-5494
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRITTANY N. HYRE ANCULLE, JAMES H. BARNES, LISA M. BATES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bell v. Hawkins et al
as 3:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
James C Bell
Defendant:
Unknown Hawkin, Randy Lavespere, Kelley Hawkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Belles v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv02179
Plaintiff:
James Stephen Belles
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CLERVRAIN et al v. DIMON et al
as 1:2021cv02918
Plaintiff:
MANETIONY CLERVRAIN, BRANDAKO, INC and ASHELEY CARMELLE DORSAINVILLE
Defendant:
JAMIE DIMON, ASHLEY BACON, LORI A. BEER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
