Cases 31 - 40 of 178
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Garrett v. Pennymac Loan Services et al
as 3:2018cv00718
Plaintiff:
June Garrett
Defendant:
Pennymac Loan Services , Stanford L. Kurland , James K. Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ledford, William et al v. Mahal et al
as 3:2017cv00959
Plaintiff:
William N. Ledford
Defendant:
Mahal , Manijeski , Constine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv11708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Bell v. Mississippi Dept. Correction Record Dept.
as 5:2017cv00063
Plaintiff:
James A. Bell
Defendant:
Mississippi Dept. Correction Record Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bell v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv03846
Plaintiff:
James L. Bell
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harshod Mehta, et al v. City of Upland, et al
as 17-55553
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARSHOD MEHTA, an individual and KAUSHIKA MEHTA
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF UPLAND, a public entity, LAVELLE BROWN and JAMES HAROLD BELL, an individual
Monaghan v. JPMorgan Chase & Co et al
as 1:2017cv02315
Plaintiff:
James C. Monaghan
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Co, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104
Stirsman v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2017cv01707
Plaintiff:
William Stirsman
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. , J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. , Board of Directors of JPMorgan Chase & Company and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
