Cases 1 - 10 of 44
THOMAS v. MILLER et al
as 4:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
MARIO M THOMAS
Defendant:
JAMES WILLIAM MILLER, SHAWN SWAIN and DAWN A HART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv04622
Plaintiff:
JAMES MICHAEL MILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tyree Ford v. Kevin Karnes, et al
as 22-14311
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYREE FORD
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN KARNES, NOELLE BRAMMIND, ROBERT NICHOLS and others
Ford v. Karnes et al
as 2:2022cv00657
Plaintiff:
Tyree Ford
Defendant:
Kevin Karnes, Noelle Brammind, Robert Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv68225
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANTONIO MILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv46004
Plaintiff:
JAMES R MILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv46094
Plaintiff:
JAMES A MILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv18153
Plaintiff:
JAMES E MILLER
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv08560
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES R MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Benton et al
as 4:2020cv00260
Plaintiff:
James F. Miller, II
Defendant:
Coastal State Prison, Head Warden Brooks Benton, Deputy Warden Glynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
