Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Lohnes v. Sue et al
as 2:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
James A Lohnes and James Andrew Lohnes
Defendant:
Nurse Practitioner Sue, Nurse Practitioner Willie, Correctional Health Indiana, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lohnes v. Warden
as 3:2021cv00013
Petitioner:
James Andrew Lohnes and James A Lohnes
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lohnes v. Warden
as 2:2020cv00130
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
James Andrew Lohnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lohnes v. United States of America et al
as 2:2020cv00117
Respondent:
United States of America, State of Indiana and Oscar Martinez Jr
Petitioner:
James Andrew Lohnes
Defendant:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lohnes v. Arredondo et al
as 2:2020cv00013
Defendant:
Hon. Lorenzo Arredondo, Deputy Clerk Wanda Gary and Deputy Clerk Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
James Andrew Lohnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lohnes v. Martinez et al
as 2:2019cv00486
Respondent:
Oscar Martinez, Jr, O'Connor, Michael A Zenk and others
Petitioner:
James Andrew Lohnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lohnes v. Magistrate Judge John E Martin
as 2:2019cv00330
Defendant:
Magistrate Judge John E Martin
Plaintiff:
James Andrew Lohnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 636
Lohnes v. Brennan et al
as 2:2019cv00314
Defendant:
S Folson, Postmaster General Megan J Brennan and S Woods
Plaintiff:
James Andrew Lohnes
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409
Lohnes v. Martinez, Jr et al
as 2:2019cv00286
Defendant:
Ryan Neary, Michael A Zenk, Joe Menchaca and others
Plaintiff:
James Andrew Lohnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lohnes v. Padula et al
as 2:2019cv00265
Defendant:
Mark N Chargualaf, William A Padula, Marce Gonzalez Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
James Andrew Lohnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
